You HAVE to [try] to read this linked post.

Some more sh1te that the UN gets up to
I was trolling looking for details on UN payments [countries are suppose to PAY to belong .........] specifically the head tosser kofi / koffee anan, and his country Ghana.

Fell into this page, spent two HOURS reading it, totally APPALLED at the state and size of incompetance throughout the entire heap..........

one in particular - Great Rant from the USS Abraham Lincoln - roughly a third of the way down, REALLY got to me. TOTAL WANK3R5

Maybe the NEXT war we'll be allowed to hose these filth ?

[edit]
Let me insist again on one point. Who profits from the existence of the UN? Let's take the five member of its Security Council.

The US? Hardly. It pays the bills while the UN has become an mechanism to try and contain its power.

Russia? It doesn't care much for it, nor does China.

The Brits? They, probably, least of all. The UK being a honest country, follows the rules, doesn't use nor abuse of its position which is frequently used by its internal and external enemies to actually reduce its legitimate influence.

Thus we're back to the usual suspect: France. The UN is an institution the function of which nowadays is to potentialize France's declining influence in the world. They know how to deal with bureaucrats in general and with Third World bureaucrats in particular, the French. They also know how to set up and how to manipulate already established NGOs. They know how to make rules that are advantageous to themselves and how to bend them when needed. The UN is basically France's megaphone nowadays.
The bloody FRENCH, I KNEW they would be in there somehow
This : from October 2004
This month, the United Nations Security Council voted to condemn terrorism. The resolution was introduced by Russia, still grieving over the terrorist attack on a school in Beslan, and perhaps the unanimous vote will give it a measure of solace. But the convoluted text and the dealings behind the scenes that were necessary to secure agreement on it offer cold comfort to anyone who cares about winning the war against terrorism. For what they reveal is that even after Beslan and after Madrid and after 9/11, the UN still cannot bring itself to oppose terrorism unequivocally.

The reason for this failure is that the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), which comprises fifty-six of the UN's 191 members, defends terrorism as a right