Aight, the suggestion is an internationlisation of the overview of the dns system. Alot of things rely on the internet and one of the things that isn't decentralised like all the rest of it is the administration of the dns system.
Nowhere is a mention of the dns stuff being run solely by the EU or even the UN for that mather... Also where the hell are them argument about why such a move is a bad thing and would go haywire/mess up dns's records/"slow down improvement". People against it are by definition non-progressive.

<offtopic kinda rantish>
The fact that the UN has guns is proof that no one wants to be told what to do. These groups have a habit of giving aid to people who do not want or need it.
The UN peacekeeping forces (wich is like such a small part of what the UN is about) are burried so deep in rules of engagement they're barely allowed to aim their guns, let alone actually fire them. Also you suggesting like half of africa being supressed by relatively small armies of powermongers is a good thing? Are you saying people rather starve from ethnic "cleansing" (vocabulary) waterpoisoning, lack of education and AIDS, then to be helped? The UN isn't perfect yet it's the best we got on alot of diplomatic things and 2nd/3rd world help.