|
-
January 14th, 2006, 08:03 AM
#41
the image and its location are more interesting to me than the supposed 'exploit'.
the image is 70x70 with a horizontal and vertical resolution of 96dpi. nothing special here except for an image of one butte ugly dude.
the url actually points to footprint.net:
hm.sc.msn.com.c.footprint.net
crawling the home directory shows nothing at all in the root directory. rather suspicious.
i tried the url on linux (FF) and xp (FF & IE). nothing crashed but in windows teatimer complained of three attemps to add a reg entry for a bho (browser helper object). a full scan of the system showed nothing, but i kick myself in the ass for trying to download anything from a url i dont know and shouldn't trust...and from a link somebody posted. i should really know better.
BTW i got the img via wget and attached it here. scanned it and it showed to be clean
Bukhari:V3B48N826 “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.’”
-
January 14th, 2006, 08:03 AM
#42
the image and its location are more interesting to me than the supposed 'exploit'.
the image is 70x70 with a horizontal and vertical resolution of 96dpi. nothing special here except for an image of one butte ugly dude.
the url actually points to footprint.net:
hm.sc.msn.com.c.footprint.net
crawling the home directory shows nothing at all in the root directory. rather suspicious.
i tried the url on linux (FF) and xp (FF & IE). nothing crashed but in windows teatimer complained of three attemps to add a reg entry for a bho (browser helper object). a full scan of the system showed nothing, but i kick myself in the ass for trying to download anything from a url i dont know and shouldn't trust...and from a link somebody posted. i should really know better.
BTW i got the img via wget and attached it here. scanned it and it showed to be clean
Bukhari:V3B48N826 “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.’”
-
January 14th, 2006, 08:20 AM
#43
Hey Hey,
I ran it just now (Said eh.. it takes me 10 hours after getting home to actually get to my PC... had a sleep though.. first one in a while.. )...
I had regprot running and I didn't notice anything trying to add itself to the registry and again Windows didn't crash (2500+, 768MB RAM, 128MB Video)
Btw... as an interesting off topic note... as I hit reply I got the status bar messages about doubleclick being blocked (thanks to the SpyBot BHO).... What's interesting is that I opened my Crash.html over top of my AO Window and suddenly the messages were appearing in that status bar... but they were for this screen.... It can't keep track of which window it's sending the messages to... it just sends them to the active IE window. (see Screenshot attached).
Peace,
HT
-
January 14th, 2006, 08:20 AM
#44
Hey Hey,
I ran it just now (Said eh.. it takes me 10 hours after getting home to actually get to my PC... had a sleep though.. first one in a while.. )...
I had regprot running and I didn't notice anything trying to add itself to the registry and again Windows didn't crash (2500+, 768MB RAM, 128MB Video)
Btw... as an interesting off topic note... as I hit reply I got the status bar messages about doubleclick being blocked (thanks to the SpyBot BHO).... What's interesting is that I opened my Crash.html over top of my AO Window and suddenly the messages were appearing in that status bar... but they were for this screen.... It can't keep track of which window it's sending the messages to... it just sends them to the active IE window. (see Screenshot attached).
Peace,
HT
-
January 15th, 2006, 02:27 AM
#45
The only problem is the Image size setting..
Opera has some sort of limit for such an over sized setting.. butt ugly loaded in a few seconds..
IE sat for ages slowing the PC . never got to see butt ugly
FF .. set the size of the image but took ages to draw the image of but ugly.. machine never slowed
change the size settings to 99 x 99 and there will be no problems ON ANY BROWSER.. even at 9999 x 9999
Your crash problem is image size settings in the HTML,, now to get MS and Mozilla to fix that little bug.. a limit image size trap..
"Consumer technology now exceeds the average persons ability to comprehend how to use it..give up hope of them being able to understand how it works." - Me http://www.cybercrypt.co.nr
-
January 15th, 2006, 02:27 AM
#46
The only problem is the Image size setting..
Opera has some sort of limit for such an over sized setting.. butt ugly loaded in a few seconds..
IE sat for ages slowing the PC . never got to see butt ugly
FF .. set the size of the image but took ages to draw the image of but ugly.. machine never slowed
change the size settings to 99 x 99 and there will be no problems ON ANY BROWSER.. even at 9999 x 9999
Your crash problem is image size settings in the HTML,, now to get MS and Mozilla to fix that little bug.. a limit image size trap..
"Consumer technology now exceeds the average persons ability to comprehend how to use it..give up hope of them being able to understand how it works." - Me http://www.cybercrypt.co.nr
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote