|
-
March 23rd, 2006, 09:02 PM
#11
Two men who stole Native American rock carvings from a Nevada mountainside
Well as it say, they took them from a mountainside - without putting a value on them - what makes then different from a normal rock on the mountainside?
I you or me took a stone from a mountain - would we expect to be prosicuted for stealing?? probably not!
They need to put a value on it to differenciate between the carvings and anything else that can be found on a mountain!
-
March 23rd, 2006, 09:11 PM
#12
Hey Guys,
I stand by what I said, but I forgot to ask; what grounds for appeal do you guys have.
Over here there are two approaches:
1. I didn't do it and have fresh evidence, or the verdict was "unsafe".............which basically means that it was a mistrial.
2. Appeal against the sentence.............like it was too harsh for the actual crime.
So, if they had tried under #1 they would not even have gotten to court over here.
-
March 24th, 2006, 07:40 AM
#13
Originally posted here by Nokia
Well as it say, they took them from a mountainside - without putting a value on them - what makes then different from a normal rock on the mountainside?
I you or me took a stone from a mountain - would we expect to be prosicuted for stealing?? probably not!
They need to put a value on it to differenciate between the carvings and anything else that can be found on a mountain!
Excellent point. I guess ignorance can be bliss, or at least...within the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
\"Greatness only comes at great risk.\" ~ Personal/Generic
-
March 24th, 2006, 10:30 AM
#14
Well as it say, they took them from a mountainside - without putting a value on them - what makes then different from a normal rock on the mountainside?
I you or me took a stone from a mountain - would we expect to be prosicuted for stealing?? probably not!
They need to put a value on it to differenciate between the carvings and anything else that can be found on a mountain!
Sorry Nokia your logic would only work if the two who stole them didn't know that they had a value. The fact that they went to the trouble to go find the statues and steal them suggest that they had a market already available for them. I am not an expert on north american indians but normally carvings like that are used to mark a site of some religious or cultural importance to the people living there. It would be like pulling away bits of stonehenge. Afterall it could be said it is just a pile of rocks and no one ever put a value to it.
\"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.\"
\"The reason we are so pleased to find other people\'s secrets is that it distracts public attention from our own.\"
Oscar Wilde(1854-1900)

-
March 24th, 2006, 10:52 AM
#15
what makes then different from a normal rock on the mountainside?
They are carved human artefacts
-
March 24th, 2006, 02:40 PM
#16
Then they are still rocks on a mountainside - just look a but different.
I you went up a mountain tomorrow and carved a face in to a rock and then left it there but then someone came along after you and took it - could you prosecute them for stealing??
Not really.
But if you could produce evidence that your carvings are worth money and belonged to you - then you could maybe prosecute.
But if you rock up in court with no evidence of how much they are worth etc...you prolly aint going to get very far!
-
March 24th, 2006, 02:54 PM
#17
A carved rock is normally called a sculpture or statue, which is considered a work of art. And to answer your question if it was my land and you stole a sculpture off it I could have you prosecuted for theft and trespassing. Your argument only really applies to public land.
\"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.\"
\"The reason we are so pleased to find other people\'s secrets is that it distracts public attention from our own.\"
Oscar Wilde(1854-1900)

-
March 24th, 2006, 04:07 PM
#18
So I take it a Mountainside in Nevada isn't public land?
-
March 24th, 2006, 04:39 PM
#19
Unfortunately OverdueSpy again failed to produce a link to the full story...otherwise we would know what land it was on...private or public.
If it was on a Reservation then it could be considered theft without attaching any value...if it was on public land then value must be attached.
If it was on privately secured land or a Reservation...then...trespassing may also be attached. If the area was designated in some special way such as a heritage site...then...other charges could be laid.
But because OverdueSpy failed to link we'll never know.
Eg
-
March 28th, 2006, 01:26 AM
#20
Eg!!!!!!!!
Can't move - Knife in back.
Now Eg you know that I normally post a link. That just happened to be the entire article from Reuters. I just didn't have time to find the full story before robbing your house - I mean catching a plane. By the way, did you ever have that Ming Dynasty vase appraised and insured. If not I am requesting to have my case moved to the 9th circuit.
The mentally handicaped are persecuted in this great country, and I say rightfully so! These people are NUTS!!!!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|