|
-
July 18th, 2006, 09:12 AM
#11
Junior Member
I very much liked the way in which you answered my very genuine questions..............and that you did not attempt to promote your own product, but also mentioned your rivals as equals.
In fact, I mostly promote the sandbox HIPS idea themself, because I believe it is the future of the anti-malware protection.
I will advise you of my findings, suggestions or whatever if you PM (personal message) me with an e-mail or even snail mail, contact.
You may send e-mail to support [at] softsphere [dot] com. I always welcome any feedback.
-
July 18th, 2006, 11:13 AM
#12
Hello Ilya ,
I agree with the concept entirely, implementation is a different issue of course
I seem to recall some AV stuff from Aladdin a few years back that used the "sandbox" principle........
it was e-safe or something like that?
Now, how good is your history? I think that the "sandbox" concept goes back to Berkley, and the start of the UNIX operating system?
-
July 18th, 2006, 07:30 PM
#13
Junior Member
Originally posted here by nihil
I agree with the concept entirely, implementation is a different issue of course
Implementation is one of the most important issues there! I don't think you will like BSOD'dy software with a huge compatibility issues number....
I seem to recall some AV stuff from Aladdin a few years back that used the "sandbox" principle........
it was e-safe or something like that?
Yes, e-Safe, but it is something another staff- their sandbox is made for unpacking/heuristics analyzing.
Now, how good is your history? I think that the "sandbox" concept goes back to Berkley, and the start of the UNIX operating system?  [/B]
Maybe, I don't know. In fact, it doesn't matter. Each technologie should be used only to solve the real user's problems, otherwise it is just academic technique.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|