Using other's unsecured wireless

[phishphreek]

Moira: I only have a second, but I should have made myself more clear. I was talking about morals and how not everyone has the same morals. Everybody has a different set molded by their upbrining, community, local/federal laws, etc. I do know the difference between right and wrong. However, our opinions are going to change on what we determine to be right or wrong. Classic example on which I don't really want to debate. Abortion: A lot of people think it is right and a lot of people think it is wrong. Capital punishment is another. I was referring to your age/wisdom as you should know that everyone doesn't have the same morals. You speak of morals as if they are one set of rules that everyone should follow. That is not true.

I tried to get a hold of someone in our "high tech computer crimes" division today but was told someone would call me back. As you can guess, I didn't hear back from them. I do know of ways to contact them through "back channels" haven't had the opportunity to do that yet. I've been invited to visit our state police department computer crimes lab a couple of times. I'll also contact some other people through our local infraguard.

Also, with regards to honeypots, there is a whole other set of legal problems. I'll refer you to http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1703 and http://www.sans.edu/resources/studen...s/Cyberlaw.pdf if you're interested.

A lot of people would view honey pots as wrong, especailly the people that will be "caught" in them. I on the other hand think they are right and enjoy playing around with them. If I get caught in a honeypot, so be it. I hope I provide interesting data... because I haven't captured anything too interesting at all.