|
-
July 21st, 2007, 02:10 AM
#38
This sh*t is way over me.
however i am happy to replicate problems and do some more diagnostics to figure it out -
The only thing I can think of ( other then contacting the vendors ) is setting up four simultaneous packet captures, one on each server machine, one on each side of the switch. Then compare for discrepancies.
A Lot of trouble for something that is now working!
Just a couple of links I came across that may or may not help:
Check System Requirements for Intel® I/O Acceleration Technology (Intel® I/OAT)
Jumbo Frame Clean Networking Gear
also, if this actually applies ( from download html files, self-extracting, User Guide for Intel® Network Adapters )
All equipment on the network must also support the larger frame size. When setting up Jumbo Frames on other network devices, be aware that different network devices calculate Jumbo Frame size differently. Some devices include the header information in the frame size while others do not. Intel adapters do not include header information in the frame size. When configuring Jumbo Frames on a switch, set the frame size four bytes higher for CRC, plus four bytes if you are using VLANs or QoS packet tagging.
" And maddest of all, to see life as it is and not as it should be" --Miguel Cervantes
Similar Threads
-
By cheyenne1212 in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: February 1st, 2012, 02:51 PM
-
By gore in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 11
Last Post: December 29th, 2003, 08:01 AM
-
By spools.exe in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 0
Last Post: September 15th, 2003, 09:47 PM
-
By -DaRK-RaiDeR- in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 9
Last Post: December 14th, 2002, 08:38 PM
-
By s0nIc in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 3
Last Post: August 30th, 2002, 07:10 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|