|
-
February 14th, 2008, 11:32 PM
#23
This type of reaction would be like penalizing someone who bathes several times a day for using too much water. I don't believe the saying goes, "cleanliness is next to gluttony".
That is exactly what happens here mate.............. water is on a meter............. use it and you pay?..................
You can also get pretty much all the bandwidth you want so long as you are prepared to pay for it 
The only problem I see is that ICPs promise services that they can only approximate to if there is redundant consumer usage, that is their business model.
They just don't have the infrastructure to deliver otherwise 
That is why they are looking at "trimming" those who are being greedy. The alternative is capping, which would affect more customers.
You must bear in mind "marketing speak"......................... "unlimited" means "unlimited so long as that does not exceed the expectations of our business model"
Similar Threads
-
By gore in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 11
Last Post: December 29th, 2003, 08:01 AM
-
By mathgirl32 in forum IDS & Scanner Discussions
Replies: 10
Last Post: February 3rd, 2003, 07:20 PM
-
By Noble Hamlet in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 1100
Last Post: March 17th, 2002, 09:38 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|