|
-
January 23rd, 2009, 06:04 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by Cheap Scotch Ron
Assuming these hacks work, I would expect you can run on VM for free, but you would be violating the license agreement.
I am not saying anything until I get a EFF lawyer, a throwaway car and collect my shoebox full of money from supporters i do not know. I don't respect anybody who is afraid of their own shadow.
Insider's Secrets
----------------------
http://tinyurl.com/d6y6o6
Last edited by Linen0ise; January 23rd, 2009 at 07:49 PM.
-
January 23rd, 2009, 07:30 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by Linen0ise
I am not saying anything until I get a EFF lawyer, a throwaway car and collect my shoebox full of money from supporters i do not know.
A shoe box? Dude add SOME at least. I wouldn't "put out" like a common prostitute in this manner for at the very LEAST anything less than my own building, which I'd name "The LaGOREatory...Like Laboratory but neater. And of course any amount of hundreds I could fit in the trunk of a car....And of course by car I mean any car I chose to drive with and could keep afterwards... Which would most likely be German...And probably BMW in nature, or Audi. And a free trip to Deutsch land..And...Well you get the idea. I'm not a sell out but I'm not stupid either.
I don't respect anybody who is afraid of their own shadow.
I AM what goes "bump in the night" buahahahahahahahah.
A few years ago I would have agreed with that. But I can't anymore. Here is why:
1. Mac Computers have done something most Linux companies and Unix vendors only wish they could do; Make an OS based on FreeBSD that is not only easy to use to the point a moron can use it, but has a beautiful GUI.
The hardware and Software.... What other machine can you buy for use as a real desktop system that has better hardware / software integration than Mac OS X and a Mac? The software is written exactly for that hardware. The hardware is made exactly for that software.
You just can't get that in a PC. Too many to have this. So on that end, they have something really neat.
I personally don't own a Mac, or any Apple hardware other than the I-Pods my Wife and I have. That's it. But no Apple Computers. Too expensive. But I'd LOVE a Macbook Pro. I doubt you'd be serious in saying those suck.
And seriously, back to the ease of use point of view; What OS maker on the planet has been able to make UNIX THAT easy? If anything I think more desktop PC makers should take notice and do what Microsoft did long ago; Rip Mac's look and features off and sell it as their own so the rest of us who think it's kind of dumb to spend like 8,000 dollars on a decent desktop can play too.
And as for Games on Macs.... Well, Doom, Doom 2, Final Doom, Quake, Quake 2, Quake 3, Unreal Tournament, and the rest of the Id software FPSs and the Unreal games, all work on Macs. And seriously, who cares about any other off the shelf games? Other games suck anyway. WOW is crap and full of perverted basement dwellers who wouldn't know a nipple from a modem.
If it's not DooM, Quake, Wolfenstein, or Unreal, it's not installed on any of MY machines. I don't allow any sissy games here.
And since, as I was saying, those all work fine on Macs, there isn't a reason to worry about gaming on one. So Macs can't suck unless you're using them for graphics and video.
Yea, I said it. I don't know WHY anyone would EVER say Mac's rule the graphic or video or music area of computing. SGI owns the graphics and video aspect. And looks cooler too 
And as for music... I've made so far two complete albums of Industrial / Techno / Electronic / Punk / Digital Horror Punk (R) (-|-/\/\) <--- Trademark funny looking thing for my made up word. with LMMS running on SUSE.
Not to say that's the best or something or that it owns the market, but I think we all know that with the way software is right now, Linux / BSD and other open OSs pretty much own the music creation area based purely on the fact that almost every piece of software made for music creation, has either been ported to, re-written for, or can run on, Linux or BSD. So why learn 2 OSs because you use 3 software titles, when all three run on one? =)
By the way, I know this is a long post. The reason is, I'm killing time in between UT2003 pwnage while watching as I attempt to tri-boot a machine with only one HD in it.
Windows 98SE, Slackware 12.2, and FreeBSD 7.1-Release all on one disk. Should be neat. I'm trying to go with the FreeBSD boot loader to see if it can loads all those. Otherwise I'm gonna have to start over and try to use Lilo.
The machine is old and taking a long time because I installed a lot. I think I'm currently getting like 450k a second from the CD-ROM drive. It doesn't have a DVD-ROM or a burner. And it's a 433MHz processor. And aCeleron at that.
Similar Threads
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 9
Last Post: May 13th, 2006, 10:17 PM
-
By gore in forum Other Tutorials Forum
Replies: 6
Last Post: October 5th, 2004, 08:26 AM
-
By Cybr1d in forum Other Tutorials Forum
Replies: 4
Last Post: February 6th, 2004, 09:30 PM
-
By warl0ck7 in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: August 14th, 2003, 12:23 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|