Yeah!

[JPnyc]

People are free to change their minds, and anything else they wish.

[westin]

Oh, well I think you are wrong!

I used to enjoy looking at the old defacements, but back then they were funny and creative... any more... not so much. At least not the ones I have seen lately.

[JPnyc]

Well, if it were something like changing the main page of the New York Post to read "the New York comPost" or the National Enquirer to "Scott bathroom tissue", something like that I would find amusing. But then I'm a simpleton.

[gore]

Some of the better stuff I've seen was WoH. Fone_Tone has some seriously awesome looking stuff.

Haven't seen much like that anymore these days. I don't really keep up with defacements, but when someone took some time into what they were putting on it, I did think it was kind of neat.

I mean really, it's the equivalent of someone doing graffiti on a building with spray paint.... A lot of it's crap by **** head kids, and some of it, once in a while....Stands out to the point you're like "Wow, that kid is awesome".

I've got some pictures I've taken of really good tags around Montreal that are amazing and really well done. I'd put Fone_Tone's defacements in the same category in that they were worthy of taking a picture of because of how good they looked.

It really depends. Spelling your name out in the typical font used by taggers isn't all that great, and everyone does it. Making the building of website a canvas is kind of impressive though because they have to do it pretty fast before cops show up and see it.

Defacements may not be as fast, because they could do the image before the break, but it's still pretty neat sometimes.