|
-
July 1st, 2009, 02:24 PM
#11
anyone else find that this version opens incredibly, ridiculously slowly? I mean it was never a snappy application from start up, but this is to the point where I wonder if I actually clicked on the icon or missed...
-
July 1st, 2009, 02:28 PM
#12
 Originally Posted by JPnyc
anyone else find that this version opens incredibly, ridiculously slowly? I mean it was never a snappy application from start up, but this is to the point where I wonder if I actually clicked on the icon or missed...
Joe it does need to load up all those uber exciting fabolously awesomebarness excitment + features now.
But yeah besides the somewhat slow loading feature, i've also noticed on some websites it actually takes a long time to load the page...
-
July 1st, 2009, 03:22 PM
#13
-
July 1st, 2009, 04:05 PM
#14
 Originally Posted by JPnyc
anyone else find that this version opens incredibly, ridiculously slowly? I mean it was never a snappy application from start up, but this is to the point where I wonder if I actually clicked on the icon or missed...
Yes, I actually quoted you, and have typed this reply since trying to open a new window. Yay! I thought they said something about being 2 times faster...
still not open 
edit:
still not open... just checked the task manager. FF is using just less than 200MB of memory. What was that browser? K-Meleon?
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
July 1st, 2009, 04:46 PM
#15
 Originally Posted by westin
Yes, I actually quoted you, and have typed this reply since trying to open a new window. Yay! I thought they said something about being 2 times faster...
still not open
edit:
still not open... just checked the task manager. FF is using just less than 200MB of memory. What was that browser? K-Meleon?
I use Maxthon1 with the DLLs of IE 8 Beta two
-
July 1st, 2009, 06:17 PM
#16
I am using K-Meleon right now. Seems to work pretty well. I have not had any problems with pages not displaying correctly, and it seems pretty snappy. It will take a little getting used to, but so far, so good.
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
July 1st, 2009, 08:25 PM
#17
First of all, you might want to look up why IE and Chrome does that to begin with. Secondly, its not even something you'd even notice unless you go about your daily computer related activities with the task manager open.
Its completely normal for a process to fluctuate in memory usage too. If firefox jumps up an extra kilobyte then oh well.
I on the other hand dislike firefox because they...
A: Care more about helping users recover from being rick-roll'ed than browsing the web
B: Broke alot of ad revenues' terms of service while advertising itself
C: Lied to E-Tards; made it sound as if it'd fix their problems instead of displaying things
-
July 2nd, 2009, 11:31 AM
#18
 Originally Posted by JPnyc
I'm sorry I upgraded.
Now tell me how many times have you said that ? 
C: Lied to E-Tards; made it sound as if it'd fix their problems instead of displaying things
One of the point's I hate firefox.
Last edited by t34b4g5; July 2nd, 2009 at 12:07 PM.
Parth Maniar,
CISSP, CISM, CISA, SSCP
*Thank you GOD*
Greater the Difficulty, SWEETER the Victory.
Believe in yourself.
-
July 2nd, 2009, 06:30 PM
#19
 Originally Posted by ByTeWrangler
Now tell me how many times have you said that ?
One of the point's I hate firefox.
Can't. I'm only 32 bit and the number requires 64.
-
July 3rd, 2009, 05:51 AM
#20
Now this is amusing... 
Mozilla slates first FireFox 3.5 patch...
Plans to patch bugs this month that went unfixed in final version
Mozilla will patch the just-released Firefox 3.5 in the next few weeks
to stamp out several bugs that went unfixed in the final version of the browser,
the company said Tuesday. Firefox 3.5.1, which Mozilla intends to deliver in mid-to-late July,
will include fixes for at least three bugs and "topcrashes,"
the term the company uses to describe the frequently-reported crashes.
Like many applications, Firefox asks users to report crashes by displaying a prompt after the browser goes down.
"[The] goal of this release should be a quick turnaround that fixes topcrashes and bugs we almost held ship for," Mozilla said in notes published after a weekly status meeting.
One of the topcrashes scheduled for a fix involves
TraceMonkey, the new, faster JavaScript engine that debuted in Firefox 3.5.
At least one of the bugs was fixed a week before Mozilla released the final code on Tuesday.
The quick patch is not unusual for Mozilla. The company did the same thing last year,
when it issued Firefox 3.0.1 four weeks after shipping Firefox 3.0, 2008's update.
Users downloaded about 6.5 million copies of Firefox 3.5 in the browser's first 36 hours, according to Mozilla's real-time counter.
Although that's a far cry from the 8.3 million copies of Firefox 3.0 Mozilla delivered in the first 24 hours of its availability last summer, it's a pace that, if sustained, would exceed the 11 million copies of Safari 4 that Apple claimed were downloaded in its first three days.
Firefox 3.5 can be downloaded in Windows, Mac and Linux editions in 58 different languages from Mozilla's site;
current users can update by choosing "Check for Updates" under the "Help" menu.
Last edited by t34b4g5; July 3rd, 2009 at 05:53 AM.
Similar Threads
-
By Black Cluster in forum Security News
Replies: 4
Last Post: October 5th, 2005, 08:28 PM
-
By scratchONtheBOX in forum Tips and Tricks
Replies: 0
Last Post: March 5th, 2005, 06:14 PM
-
By SDK in forum Spyware / Adware
Replies: 12
Last Post: February 9th, 2005, 08:11 PM
-
By neosamurai in forum General Computer Discussions
Replies: 1
Last Post: December 8th, 2004, 11:47 PM
-
By SDK in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 31
Last Post: September 9th, 2004, 07:56 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|