|
-
September 9th, 2009, 01:59 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by keezel
I disagree. Cracking TKIP (which was originally only meant to bridge the gap) is not that big of a deal. TKIP was not intended to be secure for a very long time. It was a quick fix when it was realized how vulnerable WEP is. You can now enable AES encryption instead of TKIP with WPA(version 1 OR 2) on all major routers that have been sold by retailers for at *least* the past year and you'll be running a secure wireless network again. If I'm not mistaken, WPA-AES is still vulnerable to a dictionary attack (if you're using a PSK and non-enterprise) but the algorithm itself cannot be cracked, or at least not feasibly.
The algorithms have never been the problem, it's the implementation.
Even with LM hashes, the weakness was never the actual algorithm used, it was the splitting of the string before the hash function.
EDIT: Even with TKIP, etc... THe biggest weakness was not the algorithm, it was and always has been the intialization vector dropping the effective cipher strength by 24 bits.
Real security doesn't come with an installer.
Similar Threads
-
By 576869746568617 in forum Cryptography, Steganography, etc.
Replies: 1
Last Post: July 10th, 2006, 10:38 PM
-
By CyberSpyder in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 0
Last Post: March 25th, 2003, 09:31 AM
-
By SpydaByte in forum AntiOnline's General Chit Chat
Replies: 1
Last Post: January 20th, 2003, 10:55 PM
-
By -DaRK-RaiDeR- in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 9
Last Post: December 14th, 2002, 08:38 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|