|
-
July 10th, 2010, 03:23 PM
#21
Although the ARPANET was designed to survive subordinate-network losses, the principal reason was that the switching nodes and network links were unreliable, even without any nuclear attacks. About the resources scarcity that spurred the creation of the ARPANET, Charles Herzfeld, ARPA Director (1965–1967), said:
The ARPANET was not started to create a Command and Control System that would survive a nuclear attack, as many now claim. To build such a system was, clearly, a major military need, but it was not ARPA’s mission to do this; in fact, we would have been severely criticized had we tried. Rather, the ARPANET came out of our frustration that there were only a limited number of large, powerful research computers in the country, and that many research investigators, who should have access to them, were geographically separated from them.
Sure you're right. If it's on Google or Wikipedia it must be true.
I'm working on a project that may very well put me in London right around Christmas. I have friends in Cambridge that I look forward to seeing again.
Curious, Nihil would you like to meet. I do so enjoy a good debate.
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B  8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|