PDA

Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Hardware or software?


-XSCOTTX-
April 19th, 2002, 01:21 PM
Hey there,I already have zonealarm,norton,blackice,sygate,tiny,and mcafee personal firewalls.
But as you can see i am a bit of a security freak.I was thinking about buying the LuciGate
hardware firewall and it claims to be "hacker proof".It is quite expensive but i would be pretty tight:D as long as i patch my O/S should a hacker be able to get passed it?
more can be found here http://www.lucidata.com/firewall.htm
thanx scott

RaDIaToR52
April 19th, 2002, 02:21 PM
If it is "Hacker Proof" why dosn't everybody have it?

-Radiator52

Dome
April 19th, 2002, 02:26 PM
ive learned that there is no such thing as "Hacker Proof"..... and i sure hope you dont run all those firewalls at the same time because it would be completely pointless...... i suggest choose one firewall that you can completely customize to your needs.... dont go too far with it... and also if you want get a really crappy box with 100MHz and a floppy and run a freesco router/firewall..... its not a bad free router/firewall to run.....

but if your that concerned with security transfer to *nix, get some nice patches for the distribution you get, monitor your open ports... dont leave ANY ports open unless you really use them (dont use telnet or FTP) and just keep updates... set up firewalls only on ports that need them.... dont go over-doing things

I mean im no security expert or anything, just repeating knowlage that has been passed on to me :)

Cojonudo
April 19th, 2002, 02:33 PM
Itīs probably hackeable, though.
I wish I could see the gadget ;)

RaDIaToR52
April 19th, 2002, 02:36 PM
We were just talking about this post in the IRC channle and that is way to many firewalls..
Don't they conflict?

souleman
April 19th, 2002, 02:53 PM
If something claims to be hackerproof, don't buy it. Remember Oracle 9i? The hackerproof database. Less then 6 months later, there were multiple exploits for it. Just because something hasn't been hacked doesn't mean it can't be. It just means that no one has taken the time to release an exploit for it. As fyorder said in the bugtrac list.....A firewall is only good to keep the beginners out. If a knowledgeable person wants in your system, they will get in. Your ids may tell you they own you, but they still own you.

casper3699
April 19th, 2002, 05:44 PM
The only computer that is not hackable is one that is not turned on. :)

d313t3d
April 19th, 2002, 07:54 PM
Hardware, I think, anyways, is a better way to go than the software.

Cantu
April 26th, 2002, 07:48 PM
Any company that produces a product and claims it "hacker proof" is not going to find it's products on THIS network. That mindset just does not fly from a company producing computer security solutions, although it would not be difficult to make an ultra secure SOHO firewall. I use just a hardware firewall (can't beat NAT) with no software firewall. This is what works for me and my needs but for many I recommend a hardware based NAT firewall for incomming stuff and some sort of software firewall like Kerio personal firewall (or ZA) for outgoing stuff (i.e. adware/spyware/trojans). For a desktop system tracking what your installing, what's running, and what needs updated on your box is just as or more important then expensive solutions that claim to be "hacker proof".

the_JinX
April 26th, 2002, 07:56 PM
I have a router with just one (root) user, only ssh from the outside (a 486) that router only forwards the http, ftp (anonymous and user) and mail ports, the ftp passwords are of no use on ssh etc..
so that's a pretty safe (and cheap) way to go..

So I'm with Dome on this one!

Digital_Jesus
April 26th, 2002, 08:26 PM
it speaks off needing a key and a program that must be installed on the clients to acess,(supplied with a "KeyCutter" program that runs under Windows or NT and enables you to select the-from the site) this 'key'. my comment is how secure can it possibly be if developers didnt even consider to add *nix support

Ryan Nyquist
April 30th, 2002, 10:26 PM
someone can probably pass it using a new tool or something. think about it, new programs come out every day and new hacking programs come out every day. you don't need that many firewalls. if I were you I would get rid of BlackIce because I have heard nothing but bad things about it and its just taking up more space on your system. I have recently been on norton.com and I seen some network firewall that was hardware (looked like a hub). You can check it out at http://www.norton.com/ but it probably costs like $300 and I don't think you'd need that with the number of firewalls that you have already (software).

Ryan Nyquist
April 30th, 2002, 10:28 PM
the one from norton is called Symantec Gateway Security and it is at the right side of their site (www.norton.com)

Ryan Nyquist
April 30th, 2002, 10:30 PM
ohh I noticed somethin again about it when I was reading. It is also antivirus. sounds pretty good.

Specter6
April 30th, 2002, 11:23 PM
Anything that claims to be "hacker-proof" will be hacked in short order. Once a company makes that claim, they paint a huge bullseye right on their product. Somehow, somewhere, somebody will find a way to get through.

Ryan Nyquist
May 14th, 2002, 11:39 PM
the only way to be hacker proof is to disconnect from the internet.