I just read the post for a new reason XP shouldn't be released.
http://www.antionline.com/showthread...hreadid=119817

It states the problem as being the fact that data deleted is completely destroyed.
Last I checked, Norton Utilities has a feature that will erase data to government standards - and I'm sure there are many more programs that do the same.

One of the worst things (in my opinion - that I can tell) is the raw sockets that XP allows access to.
http://grc.com/dos/sockettome.htm

Its not a bad thing if the people who use XP close these sockets off, but if they do not, DDoS attacks will get tremendously worse.
Right now, most DDoS use 98 because the majority of users are using 98 and have very lax security on their boxes.


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is impossible for an application running under
any version of Windows 3.x/95/98/ME or NT
to "spoof" its source IP or generate malicious
TCP packets such as SYN or ACK floods.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://grc.com/dos/grcdos.htm

So what happens when the majority of these users migrate over to XP? Same amount of DDoS zombies, just much more powerful and a great deal harder to track.

What do you think? Am I just paranoid or do any of you find this to be a real threat? At least in the server security business it seems like a big threat to me. Are their any other security issues you think are important? List them all because anyone who deals in security will be faced with these problems, and I would much rather discover them in a message board now, then on my server next year.