looking at the page... procesing.. (slow cpu).

Yes i think you shoud throw away norton. norton was great when i had a 486 and i was on one disk and you manualy editet the deletet files, ahhh those ware the days.

But after a time until win2k came out norton was super but now? there is to many copies and lets face it norton hasent got more pressure than microsoft on it's back.

symatech is the king of system utilitys. Noton dosent need to develop their system to manage.
there is macaffe and nuts & bults etc, but there not a big of a name.

Ever tried to install norton 2001 on XP? if you did there is a chans that you needed to re install the os. the same goes for 2002, on some configuration i work and on some it dosent.

the NAV gets an script error when installing and dosent clean upp, norton say it a ie 6.0 bugg but it's XP and microsoft says that Norton systemworks/antivirus isant compatebole ( sorry for bad english, im dysletic and swedish) and not certified for XP's file system(??).

so for a firewall och system stability i dont give a cent for norton, not while running XP and i dont like that it screws upp the system.

klients have called back after 4 days and after a short talk they say -"yes. i installed norton i own it, it's a good program suite, but i dident se the os complaning".

I rekomend to my clients panda antivirus titanium, sygate och tiny, and that thay dont mess with the system (i password the bios etc)