Well, simply put, my reply was involving the "big brother" concept that was mentioned earlier in the thread, that I quoted in my reply.

I don't support racism, and I strongly believe in freedom of speech, as well as thought. I thought I was pretty clear in my post on my stance in my previous posts. But however, I am slightly confused on something that was asked. I'm not sure what you think I was saying...

If the stuff published was kiddie porn instead of a racist remark, published as a fact, both of which are illegal whould you still have said the same thing?

Well, if some sick bastard was posting kiddie porn, they should be punished, plain and simple. No arguements from me on that one. Regardless of being illegal, I'd say it's immoral as well. Just my opinion...


Media in large has a tremendous oppertunity to control peoples opinions which is why you have a publisher.
Very true.

As I had earlier stated, I didn't read the article from the source, I read about it on another messageboard. I thought it was appropriate given the concept of Big Brother kicking in the door and arresting people for what they say, post, etc.

-Aryoche