View Poll Results: What do you think of my site?

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Super!

    1 5.26%
  • Good!

    7 36.84%
  • It\'s allright.

    9 47.37%
  • Naaaaaa.

    0 0%
  • It sucks.

    2 10.53%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Linux

  1. #11
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,883
    i like mandrake....redhat just doesn't "feel right".....i have no other excuse then that.
    That has to be the most profound thing I have ever heard on these forums, and the most accurate also. One linux distro isn't better then any other. They all run the same kernal. They can all run the same programs. Etc etc. They are just packaged differently. Some say SuSE is better because it comes with 8 CD's and 42 DVD's (ok, a little exagarated). I can download any of that information from the internet. Some say Slackware is the best because it is most customizable. Download tar-balls instead of RPM's for your Redhat machine, and you have the same thing. About the only dfference in purchasing is that Redhat has some semblance of customer support.

    Anyway, its all about what "feels right" to you.
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

  2. #12

    i agree with souleman

    mo matter which distro you use the underlying kernel is still the same(unless you modified it in some way to suit your needs)...so i dont think that opinions like SUSE is a better performer than Red Hat holds any water..again like souleman said various distros will have various packages to offer and that mind make a difference to the over all look and feel...but then these packages could be downloaded....
    i am a regular user of Red Hat..

  3. #13
    Antionline Quitter..Srsly
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    457
    well i have corel linux personally i dont like it cuz it doesnt like my win modem!
    \"\"A weak mind is like a microscope, which magnifies trifling things but cannot receive great ones.\" — G.K. Chesterton, 19th-century English essayist and poet\"

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    250
    Hmm...I guess I'd have to go with RedHat, but I haven't had much experience with all of those.
    [gloworange]Die, or surrender, either way won\'t work.[/gloworange]
    [shadow]HuntX7[/shadow]

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    800
    Just started using mandrake 8.2. like it better than redhat. got dvd and cdrw to work on first try.
    never got RH7.2 to even detect cdroms so I had RH7.1 which worked great.
    {P²P}Apocalypse kinda convinced me to switch to mandrake
    [gloworange]\"A hacker is someone who has a passion for technology, someone who is possessed by a desire to figure out how things work.\" [/gloworange]

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    101
    It doesn't like your winmodem I don't blame it. It's a software based modem that was built for "windows kept in mind" and sometimes windows doesn't even like winmodems lol

  7. #17
    Antionline Quitter..Srsly
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    457
    yea win2k for instance ...and i am not bvlaming linux i liek it i just dont like it with my pc
    \"\"A weak mind is like a microscope, which magnifies trifling things but cannot receive great ones.\" — G.K. Chesterton, 19th-century English essayist and poet\"

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    15
    I have been usin mandrake the last time.
    Used Redhat but it "doesnt feel right" .
    Gonna d-load mandrake 8.2 and test it.
    And when I get my laptop ill run Slackware on it.

    love and peace.
    Ey can you write your real name pls?
    \"My name is Overlord!\"
    ph34r starcract-nerds!

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    110
    i've been using redhat for several years, so far i've stuck to it. just haven't had time or resources to test out the other distros, except for debian, which i had to use for a 486 laptop (because it already had floppy install files ready) which i couldn't install over a network at the time.

    and i've tried a few floppy-based linux distros for a short while. quite fun.

    regards,
    mark.
    \'hi, welcome to *****. if you would like to speak to an operator, please hang up now.\'
    * click *

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •