The question is to what extent parasites like Microsoft should be parasites off the public system, or should be granted any rights at all.
His attitude shows through pretty early in the article, but I struggled through
the whole thing. His viewpoint in a nutshell:
The government should own everything. This is his definition of "democracy"

I hate microsoft as much as anyone else, but it is unreasonable to accuse
them of being a "parasite". They write software, and consumers buy it.
It's a free market. If these corporations try to outlaw open source
software, that would be unethical, but lynching Bill Gates is not my style.
The French Revolution is over.
Get over it.