I mean after all someone has to objectably judge what the best and worse are. Unless each member was responsable to make that judgment himself.
- I was meaning that what would determine your top 10 best and worst post would be based on the antipoints you recieved. Like the top 10 posts you got positive points for and the top 10 post you got negative points for.

Imo, people would see that the way to gain the most antipoints (and, yes I know, we have to teach these youngsters that antipoitns isn't the only thing to look forward to in a post) is by posting up useless crap in the GeneralChitChat or TechHumor.
- Well, it would be better to strive for positive points by makeing good post than to just continue makeing bad post and recieve negative points. Isn't that the whole purpose of the antipoint system? To encourage people to make better post? Some posts are assigned points, pos or neg, when they shouldn't be but that's something that the community needs to work on.