It appears that all of our solutions take more resources to implement, which could be garnered to better our own countries. Ok - so if we took out Saddam, what would we truly accomplish? Would someone who replaced him be better or worse? What are the actually goals of the US led force? I think there are details of all of this we are still not privvy to, but yet affect many of our lives.

I do believe we need to get into alignment with NATO on the Turkey issue. It appears we (all countries including the US) have many double-standards that we enforce based upon how best that country or groups of countries can best benefit. If we really wished to address the situation, we should have done so during Desert Storm and forcibly remove the Husayn governemnt and replaced it with one that would have worked (heh).

I still believe we should allow the loudest objectors to the current planned action that is currently led by the US/UK/AUS and we focus on NKorea and that basket of fun. Maybe we need a 'fresh' perspective and see what another set of minds can come up with in dealing with Mr. Husayn. I mean that's why we have the UN right? It looks like xmaddness made a few good points, and I also think this should not be led by the US. Let some other country's flagged be burned for awhile.