I think its a great shame that the New York Times couldnt see the benifits of someone with ethics finding and reporting theres vunerablitys,

I really think its about pride, I think the Network admins were annoyed that someone with no fixed address, who travels the country, was capable of this. Instead of the Network admins who were blatently uncapable of accepting they were wrong and working with him

Hopefully the judge when he is found will acknowledge that what he was doing was infact right, if against the law.

Hopefully he can get somepeople he worked with on other security jobs to stand up for him

i2c