|
-
December 31st, 2003, 06:40 PM
#10
Member
Originally posted here by slarty
NOOO
you totally missed the point, idiot!
Having a blank admin password is the security risk.
NOT the default shares.
Having disabled default shares, admin users CAN STILL, REMOTELY, DO ANYTHING
Just because you can't access C$, doesn't mean you can't own the machine with the admin pw.
Slarty
no i didnt miss the point. i realize that the shares in itself are not a security risk. but combined with the null admin pass it is a security risk. hell a null admin pass in itself is NOT a security risk if the users cant do anything with it. as i said i cant add a pass because my dad wants functionality over security.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|