|
-
October 15th, 2004, 05:37 AM
#1
Security by obscurity
Forgive my ignorance, but I don't really understand if one is against security by obscurity.
I mean, passwords and encryption to me are obvious implementation of it. You can't get access because you don't know the password or encryption key (it's hidden/obscured). Once you know (how to get) it, you're in. And it's just a matter of time (i.e. processing power) to crack them. IMHO only physical protections, such as physical key/access, biometric key, (two factor) token, etc, give the real "security not by obscurity" thing (not necessarily provide the best protection).
Security gurus please shed some light on this... Thanks.
Peace always,
<jdenny>
Always listen to experts. They\'ll tell you what can\'t be done and why. Then go and do it. -- Robert Heinlein
I\'m basically a very lazy person who likes to get credit for things other people actually do. -- Linus Torvalds
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|