Even if i do not contribut, this does not mean i dont have any right to analyze and response to the comments the OS'es i use in my daily life. Your comment in itself is flawed. The straight implications of this comment is l;ike saying, You dont have a webserver of your own, why are you trying to asses the strength/weaknesses of Apache/IIS.
Assessing is one thing, complaining is another. Your origonal post and this post isn't about accessing the facts and figures of insecurity. It's about typical MS bashing that everyone has heard before. If you don't help improve the operating system, don't complain about the sections of security that you refuse to help with.

linux zealots go gunvg-ho coz they are forced to go by microsoft policies.
That is the most uninformed thing I've heard today. Fanboi bashers are not forced to do anything. Fanboi bashers insult Linux/Windows because they do not understand the otherside of the technology veil. Did you know some of the top MS employees use Linux reguarly, ad assist in Linux development? Did you know Linus activley sends bug reports and insight to the developer boards to quickly improve upon possible security bugs? People who are mature enough to want to learn and assist in the security of an operating system are not "forced" to bash OS differences. They instead spend their time helping. In there eyes, be it an OS they enjoy or not, it still has a bug that needs to be addressed because a lot of people are going to become vulnerable because of it. And THAT is the reason.

M$ gets bashed for their policied, bad marketing tactic and not for technology. They gets bashed coz the use unfare practices against linux. Someone uses unfare practices against you and you have the full right to go gung-ho. And raising FUD against linux seems to be getting their favroutie of all times now.
Odd, I see as much MS bashing as I do Linux bashing. So is this MSes cue to start going gung-ho against all the whiney Linux kids? Should MS start openly attacking all the whiners on IRC or Antionline? Microsoft's marketing defence against Linux is no different thant Linux fanboi's defence against Windows. One bashes the other, the other bashes in return, and only the smarter of both sides actually try and help one another.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/

Ever been there? It's the buglist for the Linux kernel. Notice how they have their own plethora of bugs that are never ending, just like Windows. Notice how some of the bugs , security and non security, are a few months old.. even 7 - 8 months. Notice how some of the names there are very well known Windows users on the net but are assisting in bug reporting and resolution. Don't try and kid yourself, because all you've done is say "patch time bug time how many bugs tons of bugs insecure bad patching policy" when in fact Linux has the same thing. They have slow patch times with certain areas. They have numerous bugs reported each and every day. They can't fix everything in one night.

Stop throwing useless ammo around. Lick your wounds and hold in your pride. Bashing an MS employee beecause he bashed Linux isn't going to solve it. Start helping us impove the linux kernel so we can directly influence the capability of linux and shut down any possible aspects that man didn't enjoy. You want Linux to shine? Help us code the kernel, fix the kernel, and test the kernel. Want Windows secure? Help us beta-test new products, send off those error reports in Windows.

Help us out, and stop spending your time complaining when you could be changing someone's opinion of Linux with facts and capability than just a rant.