There seems to be some sort of pattern. It seems as though, currently, if you are a celebrity of any kind and you want some more "exposure" the best/fastest (sic) way of getting that is to have a "stolen" video of you with your significant other posted on the Internet. I'm not to sure what the big deal is with doing somthing like this, but if TV has taught me anything (which it hasn't) it's that the average individual will gladly replicate what they think is "envogue", which is more often than not something that is perpetuated by the actions of celebrity. As a result of this, I think that there are possibly going to be many more instances of "stolen" sex videos, celebrity or not, that will be "leaked" onto the 'net. I've got new for individuals who are victims of this...if you don't want it to be "stolen" off of your computer, you can do one of a few things. Make sure that you have a secure system, take paranoid precautions to ensure security. Two, don't put it on a computer, unless the previous. Three, don't make these videos. It's simple, I've never understood how someone can participate in these activities and then complain when they feel that their privacy has been invaded. If you don't want this, it's simple don't take part in such activities...
This reminds me of the Cleveland Indians baseball player who was in that gay porn, then acted upset when people found out about it.
It's funny that these videos conveniently surfaced right now...the limpsters might have a new CD coming out shortly and needed some publicity to put them back in the public eye...

Suffer your right of passage and make a sex video to be a true celebrity...bah.


it seems like some kind of sick advertising campaign: "Paris, Gena Lee Nolin, Fred Durst, Pam and Tommy, who will be the next one, coming to an Internet near you March 21, 2005"

But that's my rant for the week...