Hi

I actually liked it. On a daily basis, I (have to) read papers, which are written
much worse

we plan to address this in future work [16]
where [16] is a paper written in 1967. At least, they haven't given up ...

A last remark: On the url given by jinxy, you can read:
One useful purpose for such a program is to auto-generate submissions
to conferences that you suspect might have very low submission standards

gentilegenital, any hidden criticism?

Cheers.