Actually, this is where they have gotten it wrong?

The ACLU says this is unconstitutional because it essentially means paying for free speech.
The payment is not for WHAT you say ...............it is for using the facility? Like if you hired a football stadium or a theatre, that would be insured? Hell! I even have $3.4M public liability in case my house falls on someone's head

Over here, if I hired out a field, I would have PL insurance...............as these are lands under the control of the local government, they have a similar responsibility.

If the ACLU really believe in what they are saying, they should offer to pay? After all. why should local taxpayers be expected to foot the bill?

I think that they have lost the plot on this one............over here if I want to erect scaffolding I need a license and insurance, an advertising hoarding, the same..........even the vicarage garden party is insured?