My initial response was for laughs. Obviously this was taken way out of context and forseen as some kind of ad hominem attack. My apologies to any/all whom were offended as my intentions were simply to make people laugh. I fail to see why humor can't be injected into serious conversations without pissing people off but, so be it.
chazz_cs,
u arent doing much good by indirectly terrorising us !!!!!!!!
Take a chill pill. If you think my sarcastic reply was an indirect form of terrorism, then burning the meatloaf is the apocolypse I suspect?
alleyCat,
ShagDevil: Is helping someone is against your religion?
I would say that 90% of the time my replies are streamlined in order to help people or at least facilitate a solution of sorts.
In any event, this was not MindyLynne's thread. Situation in mind, I found it insulting that she/he decided to start a thread inside infectedkilljoy's thread. This tends to lead to confusion inside a thread and more often than not, focuses attention away from the subject matter at hand. I could have been a real ***** and negged MindyLynne but I didn't , instead I used the lost art of sarcasm as my reply. If you don't like it, then don't read it.