|
-
December 11th, 2007, 12:34 AM
#13
And who would be stupid enough to run a memory manager on an exchange server? Exchange basically takes all of the user mode memory and manages it itself. Most of the problems come about as a limitation of 32 bit memory structures and not poor management techniques. Now if we are talking about Exchange 5.5 or Exchange 2000 without any service packs, then yes, it did a horrible job at managing memory.
Right now, as long as you watch how your kernel mode memory is being allocated, as in making sure you don't deplete non-paged pool memory, you will not have problems on a properly sized system. Most NPP problems I've come across recently are a result of poorly coded NIC drivers, and problems with the new TCP/IP chimney offloading in windows 2003 Sp2.
Similar Threads
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 2
Last Post: October 13th, 2004, 04:31 AM
-
By Cybr1d in forum Miscellaneous Security Discussions
Replies: 11
Last Post: June 10th, 2004, 12:09 AM
-
By gore in forum Newbie Security Questions
Replies: 11
Last Post: December 29th, 2003, 08:01 AM
-
By warl0ck7 in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 7
Last Post: August 14th, 2003, 12:23 PM
-
By qwerty_smith in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 1
Last Post: February 5th, 2003, 09:41 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|