Thank you for everyones replies.
No offence taken! I know it seems funny, but I post here to see what everyone thinks. I do scale it up to Panda Labs to check it out. Its not that I dont go through Panda, I just want to see what everyone else is doing so I can make some judgement on the matter with the client.don't even know what to say about your last post Cider![]()
What is the procedure? Either reformat or wait for Panda to issue a fix? :P
It seems that maybe Panda has a bit of a pride issue... I mean no offense... They make great utilities... your post just struck me as funny...![]()
You see, Panda will only go PANDA'S way and no other way obviously. So by me posting here I see the general vibe on the particular subject, just not one sided.
And I dont trust google![]()
But thats for your replies.
Panda has said that with an updated signature file all the smithfraud variants should be taken care of ...




Reply With Quote