|
-
March 13th, 2009, 05:09 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by nihil
I would have thought that would be true of all patches? They potentially close the stable door after the horse has bolted.
The problem is they don't close the door in this case if the horse has bolted... they only close the door if the horse is already there... Meaning the other horse could bolt as well (to beat an expression to death)
I would have thought that the simplest solution would be to send a message that that the update ran successfully but action was not taken because WPAD entries existed?
That is one of the suggestions I've put forward... However Microsoft doesn't seem to agree.
I did an interview earlier this evening, which may add a little more.. it can be read here -- http://redmondmag.com/news/article.a...orialsID=10684
Similar Threads
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 1
Last Post: August 9th, 2005, 07:37 PM
-
By Tiger Shark in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 5
Last Post: January 14th, 2005, 08:47 PM
-
By mohaughn in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 2
Last Post: October 13th, 2004, 04:31 AM
-
By spools.exe in forum Microsoft Security Discussions
Replies: 0
Last Post: September 15th, 2003, 09:47 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|