I challenge you to provide me with evidence that the pictures on Google Maps street-view are in violation with any United States law.
§§ 652A-652I, because I half-heartedly looked. You didn't even do that.

unreasonable intrusion upon the seclusion of another, for example, physical invasion of a person's home (e.g., unwanted entry, looking into windows with binoculars or camera, tapping telephone), searching wallet or purse, repeated and persistent telephone calls, obtaining financial data (e.g., bank balance) without person's consent, etc.

It DOES NOT MATTER how clear these pictures and recordings are. Having these cameras setup a yard above the vehicle itself to peer over fences... and just the potential to view something inside a home is enought.

appropriation of a person's name or likeness; successful assertions of this right commonly involve defendant's use of a person's name or likeness on a product label or in advertising a product or service. A similar concept is the "right of publicity" in Restatement (Third) Unfair Competition §§46-47 (1995). The distinction is that privacy protects against "injury to personal feelings", while the right of publicity protects against unauthorized commercial exploitation of a person's name or face. As a practical matter, celebrities generally sue under the right of publicity, while ordinary citizens sue under privacy.

publication of private facts, for example, income tax data, sexual relations, personal letters, family quarrels, medical treatment, photographs of person in his/her home. publication that places a person in a false light, which is similar to defamation.

The private facts where gained the moment they took these pictures not just when they sniffed wireless traffic. Every bit of it applies to them... all of it.

Hows this street view different to you invading webmasters privacy and defacing there property?
What? You mean these companys are monetizing the internet? All these nations that are censoring themselves to the point of complete separation from the internet at large? To hell with these guys. The only real argument to be had are these Mom-And-Pop.com domains.