Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Telnet useless?

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    262
    yeah thats true cwk9, but there is ssh if ya loooking for security but that may not be what ur talking about security wise.
    aislinn, Aria, BTBAM, chevelle, codeseven, Cky, dredg, evergreen terrace, from autumn to ashes,hopesfall, hxc, luti-kriss, nirvana, norma jean, shai hulud, this hero dies, tool, underoath, zao,

  2. #12
    AntiOnline Senior Member souleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    2,883
    Mucolaca> By blocking telnet at the ISP, no one is saying you can't telnet out. A lot of places have the ISP block any incomming request to port 23. If you install an SSH server, there is NO need to have 23 open. And if you are running a box with 23 open, you are just asking for trouble.
    \"Ignorance is bliss....
    but only for your enemy\"
    -- souleman

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    711
    There are still a lot of routers and RAS servers and the like the "require" telnet if you want to get in to them remotely (ie. to admin them). Yeah... pretty much means that you get to setup a "secure" segment/vlan that only runs that sort of stuff if you want to try to make it unsnoopable (or put an ssh server in front of it with a small private net, etc).

    But telnet has other uses other than just "login" -- I'll refrain for further "useful information" in this forum, however.
    \"Windows has detected that a gnat has farted in the general vicinity. You must reboot for changes to take affect. Reboot now?\"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •